MedSkillAudit: A Domain-Specific Audit Framework for Medical Research Agent Skills
Background: Agent skills are increasingly deployed as modular, reusable capability units in AI agent systems. Medical research agent skills require safeguards beyond general-purpose evaluation, including scientific integrity, methodological validity, reproducibility, and boundary safety. This study developed and preliminarily evaluated a domain-specific audit framework for medical research agent skills, with a focus on reliability against expert review. Methods: We developed MedSkillAudit (skill
Record details
Published: 22 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governed Auditable Decisioning Under Uncertainty: Synthesis and Agentic Extension
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Persona-Based Requirements Engineering for Explainable Multi-Agent Educational Systems: A Scenario Simulator for Clinical Reasoning Training
arXiv · 19 April 2026
DeepER-Med: Advancing Deep Evidence-Based Research in Medicine Through Agentic AI
arXiv · 16 April 2026
A self-evolving agent for explainable diagnosis of DFT-experiment band-gap mismatch
arXiv · 29 April 2026
A Framework for Longitudinal Health AI Agents
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Governed Reasoning for Institutional AI
arXiv · 12 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 April 2026), “MedSkillAudit: A Domain-Specific Audit Framework for Medical Research Agent Skills,” evidence record 5504, https://ethics.ai/record/5504 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.