Leveraging Multimodal LLMs for Built Environment and Housing Attribute Assessment from Street-View Imagery
We present a novel framework for automatically evaluating building conditions nationwide in the United States by leveraging large language models (LLMs) and Google Street View (GSV) imagery. By fine-tuning Gemma 3 27B on a modest human-labeled dataset, our approach achieves strong alignment with human mean opinion scores (MOS), outperforming even individual raters on SRCC and PLCC relative to the MOS benchmark. To enhance efficiency, we apply knowledge distillation, transferring the capabilities
Record details
Published: 22 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Characterizing AlphaEarth Embedding Geometry for Agentic Environmental Reasoning
arXiv · 20 April 2026
Cognitive Alignment At No Cost: Inducing Human Attention Biases For Interpretable Vision Transformers
arXiv · 21 April 2026
The Granularity Gap: A Multi-Dimensional Longitudinal Audit of Sycophancy in Gemini Models
arXiv · 19 April 2026
X-Voice: Enabling Everyone to Speak 30 Languages via Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Voice Cloning
arXiv · 7 May 2026
The Topology of Multimodal Fusion: Why Current Architectures Fail at Creative Cognition
arXiv · 6 April 2026
Structured Intent as a Protocol-Like Communication Layer: Cross-Model Robustness, Framework Comparison, and the Weak-Model Compensation Effect
arXiv · 31 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 April 2026), “Leveraging Multimodal LLMs for Built Environment and Housing Attribute Assessment from Street-View Imagery,” evidence record 5479, https://ethics.ai/record/5479 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.