Decision Evidence Maturity Model for Agentic AI: A Property-Level Method Specification
Agentic AI systems produce decision evidence at scale through execution telemetry, but property-level reconstruction often fails when an external party asks a specific governance question about a specific decision: the assembled evidence is insufficient to answer it. We name this pattern the container fallacy: the automatic equation of evidence-container presence with audit sufficiency. This paper specifies the Decision Evidence Maturity Model (DEMM), a property-level reconstructability method f
Record details
Published: 29 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governed Auditable Decisioning Under Uncertainty: Synthesis and Agentic Extension
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Property-Level Reconstructability of Agent Decisions: An Anchor-Level Pilot Across Vendor SDK Adapter Regimes
arXiv · 12 May 2026
DEMM-Bench: A Cross-Regime Benchmark for Agent-Runtime Governance-Evidence Sufficiency
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Governing What the EU AI Act Excludes: Accountability for Autonomous AI Agents in Smart City Critical Infrastructure
arXiv · 1 May 2026
Accountable Agents in Software Engineering: An Analysis of Terms of Service and a Research Roadmap
arXiv · 6 May 2026
Stateless Decision Memory for Enterprise AI Agents
arXiv · 22 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 April 2026), “Decision Evidence Maturity Model for Agentic AI: A Property-Level Method Specification,” evidence record 5227, https://ethics.ai/record/5227 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.