An explainable hypothesis-driven approach to Drug-Induced Liver Injury with HADES
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a leading cause of late-stage clinical trial attrition. However, existing computational predictors primarily rely on binary classification, a framing that limits generalization and yields no mechanistic insight to guide translational decisions. We argue that DILI prediction is better posed as an explainable hypothesis-generation problem. To support this shift, we introduce the DILER Benchmark, a dataset that extends beyond binary labels by augmenting a cu
Record details
Published: 4 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency · Biotech
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Explainable Multi-Task Retinal Imaging Reveals Microvascular Signals for Systemic Risk Stratification in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
arXiv · 24 May 2026
Co-design for Trustworthy AI: An Interpretable and Explainable Tool for Type 2 Diabetes Prediction Using Genomic Polygenic Risk Scores
arXiv · 9 April 2026
Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension
OpenAlex · 9 September 2020
Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension
OpenAlex · 9 September 2020
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension
OpenAlex · 9 September 2020
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension
OpenAlex · 9 September 2020
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 May 2026), “An explainable hypothesis-driven approach to Drug-Induced Liver Injury with HADES,” evidence record 5016, https://ethics.ai/record/5016 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.