Moral Sensitivity in LLMs: A Tiered Evaluation of Contextual Bias via Behavioral Profiling and Mechanistic Interpretability
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings that require nuanced ethical reasoning, yet existing bias evaluations treat model outputs as simply "biased" or "unbiased." This binary framing misses the gradual, context-sensitive way bias actually emerges. We address this gap in two stages: behavioral profiling and mechanistic validation. In the behavioral stage, we introduce the Moral Sensitivity Index (MSI), a metric that quantifies the probability of biased output across a
Record details
Published: 4 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Brainrot: Deskilling and Addiction are Overlooked AI Risks
arXiv · 5 May 2026
Structured Diffusion Bridges: Inductive Bias for Denoising Diffusion Bridges
arXiv · 3 May 2026
RLearner-LLM: Balancing Logical Grounding and Fluency in Large Language Models via Hybrid Direct Preference Optimization
arXiv · 6 May 2026
Misaligned by Reward: Socially Undesirable Preferences in LLMs
arXiv · 6 May 2026
Resolving the bias-precision paradox with stochastic causal representation learning for personalized medicine
arXiv · 7 May 2026
AI Alignment Amplifies the Role of Race, Gender, and Disability in Hiring Decisions
arXiv · 2 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 May 2026), “Moral Sensitivity in LLMs: A Tiered Evaluation of Contextual Bias via Behavioral Profiling and Mechanistic Interpretability,” evidence record 4993, https://ethics.ai/record/4993 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.