What You Think is What You See: Driving Exploration in VLM Agents via Visual-Linguistic Curiosity
To navigate partially observable visual environments, recent VLM agents increasingly internalize world modeling capabilities into their policies via explicit CoT reasoning, enabling them to mentally simulate futures before acting. However, relying solely on passive reasoning over visited states is insufficient for sparse-reward tasks, as it lacks the epistemic drive to actively uncover the ``known unknown'' required for robust generalization. We ask: Can VLM agents actively find signals that cha
Record details
Published: 5 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Mechanical Conscience: A Mathematical Framework for Dependability of Machine Intelligence
arXiv · 5 May 2026
LLM-ADAM: A Generalizable LLM Agent Framework for Pre-Print Anomaly Detection in Additive Manufacturing
arXiv · 5 May 2026
Architectural Constraints Alignment in AI-assisted, Platform-based Service Development
arXiv · 6 May 2026
How Far Are VLMs from Privacy Awareness in the Physical World? An Empirical Study
arXiv · 6 May 2026
Partial Evidence Bench: Benchmarking Authorization-Limited Evidence in Agentic Systems
arXiv · 6 May 2026
Prediction and Empowerment: A Theory of Agency through Bridge Interfaces
arXiv · 7 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 May 2026), “What You Think is What You See: Driving Exploration in VLM Agents via Visual-Linguistic Curiosity,” evidence record 4959, https://ethics.ai/record/4959 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.