The AI Legal Specialist: A Juridically Autonomous Professional Profile for AI Governance
The rapid global expansion of artificial intelligence regulation has generated, across multiple jurisdictions, a demand for legal expertise dedicated to AI that the market has addressed in a fragmented manner. Data protection officers extend their remit beyond data protection law; privacy lawyers reposition themselves toward AI; compliance officers add AI chapters to their existing manuals. This paper argues that none of these adaptive responses adequately covers the professional space opened by
Record details
Published: 7 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Privacy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Inferential Capability Does Not Determine Legal Scope
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Inferential Capability Does Not Determine Legal Scope
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
From Review to Design: Ethical Multimodal Driver Monitoring Systems for Risk Mitigation, Incident Response, and Accountability in Automated Vehicles
arXiv · 7 May 2026
When RAG Chatbots Expose Their Backend: An Anonymized Case Study of Privacy and Security Risks in Patient-Facing Medical AI
arXiv · 1 May 2026
End-to-End Evaluation and Governance of an EHR-Embedded AI Agent for Clinicians
arXiv · 30 April 2026
BiFedKD: Bidirectional Federated Knowledge Distillation Framework for Non-IID and Long-Tailed ECG Monitoring
arXiv · 14 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 May 2026), “The AI Legal Specialist: A Juridically Autonomous Professional Profile for AI Governance,” evidence record 4860, https://ethics.ai/record/4860 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.