DRIP-R: A Benchmark for Decision-Making and Reasoning Under Real-World Policy Ambiguity in the Retail Domain
LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed for routine but consequential tasks in real-world domains, where their behavior is governed by inherently ambiguous domain policies that admit multiple valid interpretations. Despite the prevalence of such ambiguities in practice, existing agent benchmarks largely assume unambiguous, well-specified policies, leaving a critical evaluation gap. We introduce DRIP-R, a benchmark that systematically exploits real-world retail policy ambiguities to construct
Record details
Published: 8 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Multi-Level Agent-Based Architecture for Climate Governance Integrating Cognitive and Institutional Dynamics
arXiv · 8 May 2026
SOD: Step-wise On-policy Distillation for Small Language Model Agents
arXiv · 8 May 2026
SARC: A Governance-by-Architecture Framework for Agentic AI Systems
arXiv · 8 May 2026
LiteGUI: Distilling Compact GUI Agents with Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · 8 May 2026
Execution Envelopes: A Shared Admission Contract for Backend AI Execution Requests
arXiv · 8 May 2026
Same Signal, Opposite Meaning: Direction-Informed Adaptive Learning for LLM Agents
arXiv · 7 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (8 May 2026), “DRIP-R: A Benchmark for Decision-Making and Reasoning Under Real-World Policy Ambiguity in the Retail Domain,” evidence record 4732, https://ethics.ai/record/4732 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.