DuetFair: Coupling Inter- and Intra-Subgroup Robustness for Fair Medical Image Segmentation
Medical image segmentation models can perform unevenly across subgroups. Most existing fairness methods focus on improving average subgroup performance, implicitly treating each subgroup as internally homogeneous. However, this can hide difficult cases within a subgroup, where high-loss samples are obscured by the subgroup mean. We call this problem \textbf{intra-group hidden failure}. To solve this, we propose \textbf{DuetFair} mechanism, a dual-axis fairness framework that jointly considers in
Record details
Published: 11 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Causal Fairness for Survival Analysis
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Fairness of Explanations in Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Unifying Framework, Axioms, and Future Direction toward Responsible AI
arXiv · 11 May 2026
Avoiding Structural Failure Modes in Tabular Fair SSL: Online Primal-Dual Allocation under Confidence Gating
arXiv · 15 May 2026
Resolving the bias-precision paradox with stochastic causal representation learning for personalized medicine
arXiv · 7 May 2026
To Call or Not to Call: Diagnosing Intrinsic Over-Calling Bias in LLM Agents
arXiv · 16 May 2026
FairEnc: A Fair Vision-Language Model with Fair Vision and Text Encoders for Glaucoma Detection
arXiv · 6 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 May 2026), “DuetFair: Coupling Inter- and Intra-Subgroup Robustness for Fair Medical Image Segmentation,” evidence record 4555, https://ethics.ai/record/4555 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.