Unmasking On-Policy Distillation: Where It Helps, Where It Hurts, and Why
On-policy distillation offers dense, per-token supervision for training reasoning models; however, it remains unclear under which conditions this signal is beneficial and under which it is detrimental. Which teacher model should be used, and in the case of self-distillation, which specific context should serve as the supervisory signal? Does the optimal choice vary from one token to the next? At present, addressing these questions typically requires costly training runs whose aggregate performan
Record details
Published: 11 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Switching-Geometry Analysis of Deflated Q-Value Iteration
arXiv · 11 May 2026
PhyGround: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in Generative World Models
arXiv · 11 May 2026
The Many Faces of On-Policy Distillation: Pitfalls, Mechanisms, and Fixes
arXiv · 11 May 2026
Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome, the new name for polycystic ovary syndrome: a multistep global consensus process
OpenAlex · 12 May 2026
Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing
arXiv · 11 May 2026
Metric-Gradient Projection for Stable Multi-Agent Policy Learning
arXiv · 12 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 May 2026), “Unmasking On-Policy Distillation: Where It Helps, Where It Hurts, and Why,” evidence record 4538, https://ethics.ai/record/4538 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.