CW-B: Class Weighted Boosting Framework for Imbalance Resilient Multi Class Cardiac Phenotyping
Cardiac discharge phenotyping informs post-discharge treatment and follow-up, but real-world records are often incomplete and class-imbalanced, increasing the risk of missed high-risk phenotypes. We propose CW-B, a clinical risk-aligned class-weighted XGBoost pipeline for five-class cardiac discharge phenotyping under real-world class imbalance and missingness. CW-B combines fold-specific class-balanced instance weighting, missingness-indicator augmentation, and classwise error auditing to impro
Record details
Published: 29 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SEVA: Self-Evolving Verification Agent with Process Reward for Fact Attribution
arXiv · 29 June 2026
Always-OnAgents:A Survey of Persistent Memory, State, and Governance in LLMAgents
arXiv · 29 June 2026
Scientific Explanations in Health Sciences: Causality, Trust, and Epistemic Adequacy
arXiv · 30 June 2026
From Black-Box to Clinical Insight: A Multi-Stage Explainable Framework for Speech-Based Cognitive Impairment Detection
arXiv · 26 June 2026
Auditing Framing-Sensitive Behavioral Instability in Large Language Models for Mental Health Interactions
arXiv · 25 June 2026
SamaVaani: Auditing and Debiasing Multilingual Clinical ASR for Indian Languages
arXiv · 25 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 June 2026), “CW-B: Class Weighted Boosting Framework for Imbalance Resilient Multi Class Cardiac Phenotyping,” evidence record 453, https://ethics.ai/record/453 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.