GEAR: Granularity-Adaptive Advantage Reweighting for LLM Agents via Self-Distillation
Reinforcement learning has become a widely used post-training approach for LLM agents, where training commonly relies on outcome-level rewards that provide only coarse supervision. While finer-grained credit assignment is promising for effective policy updates, obtaining reliable local credit and assigning it to the right parts of the long-horizon trajectory remains an open challenge. In this paper, we propose Granularity-adaptivE Advantage Reweighting (GEAR), an adaptive-granularity credit assi
Record details
Published: 12 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
On-Policy Self-Evolution via Failure Trajectories for Agentic Safety Alignment
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Missing Old Logits in Asynchronous Agentic RL: Semantic Mismatch and Repair Methods for Off-Policy Correction
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Property-Level Reconstructability of Agent Decisions: An Anchor-Level Pilot Across Vendor SDK Adapter Regimes
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Iterative Audit Convergence in LLM-Managed Multi-Agent Systems: A Case Study in Prompt-Engineering Quality Assurance
arXiv · 12 May 2026
LLM-X: A Scalable Negotiation-Oriented Exchange for Communication Among Personal LLM Agents
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Metric-Gradient Projection for Stable Multi-Agent Policy Learning
arXiv · 12 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 May 2026), “GEAR: Granularity-Adaptive Advantage Reweighting for LLM Agents via Self-Distillation,” evidence record 4483, https://ethics.ai/record/4483 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.