To Whom Do Language Models Align? Measuring Principal Hierarchies Under High-Stakes Competing Demands
Language models deployed in high-stakes professional settings face conflicting demands from users, institutional authorities, and professional norms. How models act when these demands conflict reveals a principal hierarchy -- an implicit ordering over competing stakeholders that determines, for instance, whether a medical AI receiving a cost-reduction directive from a hospital administrator complies at the expense of evidence-based care, or refuses because professional standards require it. Acro
Record details
Published: 12 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
EHR-RAGp: Retrieval-Augmented Prototype-Guided Foundation Model for Electronic Health Records
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Symmetry in the Wild: The Role of Equivariance in Neural Fluid Surrogates
arXiv · 12 May 2026
EpiCastBench: Datasets and Benchmarks for Multivariate Epidemic Forecasting
arXiv · 12 May 2026
What Do EEG Foundation Models Capture from Human Brain Signals?
arXiv · 12 May 2026
AcuityBench: Evaluating Clinical Acuity Identification and Uncertainty Alignment
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Causal Fairness for Survival Analysis
arXiv · 12 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 May 2026), “To Whom Do Language Models Align? Measuring Principal Hierarchies Under High-Stakes Competing Demands,” evidence record 4462, https://ethics.ai/record/4462 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.