Unweighted ranking for value-based decision making with uncertainty
As intelligent systems are increasingly implemented in our society to make autonomous decisions, their commitment to human values raises serious concerns. Their alignment with human values remains a critical challenge because it can jeopardise the integrity and security of citizens. For this reason, an innovative human-centred and values-driven approach to decision making is required. In this work, we introduce the Fuzzy-Unweighted Value-Based Decision Making (FUW-VBDM) framework, where agents i
Record details
Published: 13 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Position: Assistive Agents Need Accessibility Alignment
arXiv · 13 May 2026
From Descriptive to Prescriptive: Uncover the Social Value Alignment of LLM-based Agents
arXiv · 13 May 2026
ProtoMedAgent: Multimodal Clinical Interpretability via Privacy-Aware Agentic Workflows
arXiv · 13 May 2026
Not Just RLHF: Why Alignment Alone Won't Fix Multi-Agent Sycophancy
arXiv · 13 May 2026
Beyond Binary: Reframing GUI Critique as Continuous Semantic Alignment
arXiv · 14 May 2026
No More, No Less: Task Alignment in Terminal Agents
arXiv · 12 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 May 2026), “Unweighted ranking for value-based decision making with uncertainty,” evidence record 4383, https://ethics.ai/record/4383 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.