XSearch: Explainable Code Search via Concept-to-Code Alignment
Semantic code search has been widely adopted in both academia and industry. These approaches embed natural-language queries and code snippets into a shared embedding space and retrieve results based on vector similarity. Despit strong performance on benchmark datasets, they often suffer from poor explainability and generalization. Retrieved code may appear semantically similar yet miss critical functional requirements of the query, while providing no explanation of why the result was retrieved.
Record details
Published: 15 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Marginal Alignment Does Not Guarantee Joint-Distribution Fidelity: An Official-Reference Audit of Nemotron-Personas-Korea with Cross-Locale Replication
arXiv · 15 May 2026
Beyond Anthropomorphism: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Non-humanity and Structural Similarity in Deep Self-Disclosure Toward Generative AI
arXiv · 13 May 2026
Tracing Persona Vectors Through LLM Pretraining
arXiv · 13 May 2026
REBAR: Reference Ethical Benchmark for Autonomy Readiness
arXiv · 18 May 2026
Two Wrongs, No Right: Auditing Social-Desirability Bias in LLM Annotators for Computational Social Science
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Exploring and Developing a Pre-Model Safeguard with Draft Models
arXiv · 19 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 May 2026), “XSearch: Explainable Code Search via Concept-to-Code Alignment,” evidence record 4266, https://ethics.ai/record/4266 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.