What Does the AI Doctor Value? Auditing Pluralism in the Clinical Ethics of Language Models
Medicine is inherently pluralistic. Principles such as autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice routinely conflict, and such ethical dilemmas often sharply divide reasonable physicians. Good clinical practice navigates these tensions in concert with each patient's values rather than imposing a single ethical stance. The ethical values that large language models bring to medical advice, however, have not been systematically examined. We present a framework for auditing value pluralism i
Record details
Published: 18 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Going Headless? On the Boundaries of Vertical AI Firms
arXiv · 18 May 2026
SURGENT: A Surgical Multi-Agent Assistance System Across the Perioperative Workflow
arXiv · 28 May 2026
ADAPTS: Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms
arXiv · 4 May 2026
Auditing LLM-Governed Social Robots with Culture-Specific Moral Gradients
arXiv · 2 June 2026
A self-evolving agent for explainable diagnosis of DFT-experiment band-gap mismatch
arXiv · 29 April 2026
The Containment Gap: How Deployed Agentic AI Frameworks Fail Public-Facing Safety Requirements
arXiv · 11 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (18 May 2026), “What Does the AI Doctor Value? Auditing Pluralism in the Clinical Ethics of Language Models,” evidence record 4090, https://ethics.ai/record/4090 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.