Evidence record 3820 · automatically gathered

Jailbreak to Protect: Buffering and Reinforcing via Temporary Jailbreaking for Safe Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models

Fine-tuning-as-a-Service (FaaS) enables personalization of large language models (LLMs), but it can weaken safety-alignment under harmful fine-tuning attacks. Recent work has shown that activating harmful-behavior modules during fine-tuning can prevent models from learning undesired behaviors, but its mechanism remains unclear. In this paper, we revisit temporary jailbreaking as a defense against harmful fine-tuning and provide a gradient-level analysis showing that it saturates safety-degrading

Record details

Published: 23 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Military & security
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (23 May 2026), “Jailbreak to Protect: Buffering and Reinforcing via Temporary Jailbreaking for Safe Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models,” evidence record 3820, https://ethics.ai/record/3820 (originally published by arXiv).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.