Latent Goal Prediction from Language for Model-Based Planning
Planning with world models is bottlenecked by compounding prediction errors and the difficulty of defining optimizable goals. Visual targets provide precise local gradients but poor distant guidance, while language is flexible yet limited by noisy cross-modal alignment or dependence on large generative models unsuited for the high-sampling nature of model-based planning. To address these challenges, we introduce Latent Goal Prediction from Language (LAGO), a framework that predicts both sequence
Record details
Published: 26 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Behavioural Analysis of Alignment Faking
arXiv · 26 May 2026
DeepSciVerify: Verifying Scientific Claim--Citation Alignment via LLM-Driven Evidence Escalation
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Alignment Tampering: How Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback Is Exploited to Optimize Misaligned Biases
arXiv · 26 May 2026
When Eyes Betray AI: Social Gaze Consistency as a Semantic Cue for AI-Generated Image Detection
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Falcon-X: A Time Series Foundation Model for Heterogeneous Multivariate Modeling
arXiv · 26 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (26 May 2026), “Latent Goal Prediction from Language for Model-Based Planning,” evidence record 3647, https://ethics.ai/record/3647 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.