Operational AI Deployment Assurance: Governance-State Orchestration Under Threshold-Sensitive Deployment Conditions -- A Governance Framework for High-Stakes AI Systems
AI governance frameworks increasingly emphasize fairness, transparency, accountability, and lifecycle risk management in high-stakes domains. However, many current approaches remain observational, relying on static metric reporting, post-hoc auditing, and monitoring dashboards without directly governing deployment readiness, remediation progression, escalation states, or assurance-driven deployment control. This paper introduces Operational AI Deployment Assurance (OADA), a governance framework
Record details
Published: 27 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Why Aggregate Accuracy is Inadequate for Evaluating Fairness in Law Enforcement Facial Recognition Systems
arXiv · 30 March 2026
Ontological Knowledge Blocks: Executable Compliance and Profile-Based Validation for Trustworthy AI Systems
arXiv · 22 May 2026
A Variational Framework for LLM Generator-Regulator Games
arXiv · 16 June 2026
How Supply Chain Dependencies Complicate Bias Measurement and Accountability Attribution in AI Hiring Applications
arXiv · 24 April 2026
Sequential Fairness Auditing with Limited Output Access
arXiv · 29 June 2026
"Taking Stock at FAccT": Using Participatory Design to Co-Create a Vision for the Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Community
arXiv · 17 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 May 2026), “Operational AI Deployment Assurance: Governance-State Orchestration Under Threshold-Sensitive Deployment Conditions -- A Governance Framework for High-Stakes AI Systems,” evidence record 3632, https://ethics.ai/record/3632 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.