Measuring Progress Toward AGI: A Cognitive Framework
Despite widespread discussion of AGI, there is no clear framework for measuring progress toward it. This ambiguity fuels subjective claims, makes it difficult to track progress, and risks hindering responsible governance. As a starting point to address this gap, we present a framework for understanding system capabilities in relation to human cognitive abilities. Drawing from decades of research in psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive science, we introduce a Cognitive Taxonomy that deconstruc
Record details
Published: 27 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
ADWIN: Adaptive Windows for Horizon-Aware On-Policy Distillation
arXiv · 27 May 2026
SafeMed-R1: Clinician-Audited Safety and Ethics Alignment for Medical Large Language Models
arXiv · 27 May 2026
Efficient and Scalable Provenance Tracking for LLM-Generated Code Snippets
arXiv · 27 May 2026
DREAM-R: Multimodal Speculative Reasoning with RL-Based Refined Drafting, Precise Verification, and Fully Parallel Execution
arXiv · 27 May 2026
BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law
arXiv · 27 May 2026
Return-to-Go Is More Than a Number: Q-Guided Alignment for Return-Conditioned Supervised Learning
arXiv · 27 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 May 2026), “Measuring Progress Toward AGI: A Cognitive Framework,” evidence record 3595, https://ethics.ai/record/3595 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.