Human-Alignment, Calibration, and Activation Patterns in Large Language Model Uncertainty
Uncertainty Quantification is a large and growing subfield of large language model behavioral analysis. Primarily to recognize and combat hallucination, the field has largely focused on measuring and improving calibration, the accuracy of uncertainty judgments to task efficacy. In this work, we investigate the relatively underexplored question of how similar large language model uncertainty is to human uncertainty. We investigate the presence and strength of human-similar uncertainty signals, de
Record details
Published: 29 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Rationalize: Shared Semantic Reasoning for Human-AI Alignment
arXiv · 28 May 2026
What Makes LVLMs Hallucinate Less? Unveiling the Architectural Factors Behind Hallucination Robustness
arXiv · 29 May 2026
Subtitle-Aligned Fine-Tuning of Whisper for Swiss German ASR: Benchmark Contamination, Convention Mismatch, and an Honest Baseline at 25.6% WER (13.8% cWER)
arXiv · 29 May 2026
Beyond Bilingual Transfer: Multilingual Code-Switching in Instruction Tuning
arXiv · 28 May 2026
On the Limits of LLM Adaptability: Impact of Model-Internalized Priors on Annotation Task Performance
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Models That Know How Evaluations Are Designed Score Safer
arXiv · 27 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 May 2026), “Human-Alignment, Calibration, and Activation Patterns in Large Language Model Uncertainty,” evidence record 3468, https://ethics.ai/record/3468 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.