Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input
Alignment teaches vision-language models (VLMs) to avoid expressing demographic biases, and when gender is clearly visible they largely succeed. Far less is known about ambiguous inputs (a worker in full gear, a figure seen from behind) cases common in practice yet rarely studied. We find that minimal prompting pressure exposes occupation-gender defaults when prompting ambiguous input images, with models collapsing to male even for strongly female-stereotyped occupations. But do these outputs re
Record details
Published: 29 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
DOA: Training-Free Decoder-Only Attention Policy for Long-Form Simultaneous Translation with SpeechLLMs
arXiv · 29 May 2026
Isolating LLM Lexical Bias: A Curation-Free Triangulated Metric for Preference-Stage Learning
arXiv · 29 May 2026
ROGUE: Misaligned Agent Behavior Arising from Ordinary Computer Use
arXiv · 29 May 2026
MyoSem: Aligning Electromyography to Natural-Language Action Semantics for Hand Action Understanding
arXiv · 29 May 2026
Subtitle-Aligned Fine-Tuning of Whisper for Swiss German ASR: Benchmark Contamination, Convention Mismatch, and an Honest Baseline at 25.6% WER (13.8% cWER)
arXiv · 29 May 2026
Next-Billion AI Index: The compass for AI utility and adoption in the global majority
arXiv · 29 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 May 2026), “Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input,” evidence record 3422, https://ethics.ai/record/3422 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.