Agentic Skill Optimization over Lie Algebroids
Agentic systems increasingly improve themselves by editing skills: prompts, rubrics, plans, tool contracts, examples, validators, and traces. Skill edits are not independent coordinates in a vector space: they are local repairs to structured artifacts whose effects are observed only after rollout, validation, and critique. Distinct edits can have the same immediate visible effect while differing in routing context, template state, guardrail scope, or future composability. The order of edits can
Record details
Published: 13 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Auditing the Risk Claims of Distributional Reinforcement Learning
arXiv cs.AI · 13 July 2026
Agent Hacks Agent: Autoresearch for Production-Agent Red-Teaming
arXiv cs.AI · 13 July 2026
Forgetting Our Way to Shared Meaning: Effects of Forgetting on Conceptual Alignment in a Non-Partnership Coordination Game
arXiv cs.HC · 13 July 2026
Towards Predictive, Aligned, and Scalable Robot Learning
arXiv · 13 July 2026
Designing Agent-Ready Websites for AI Web Agents: A Framework for Machine Readability, Actionability, and Decision Reliability
arXiv cs.HC · 13 July 2026
Operationalising Multi-Dimensional Evaluation for Conversational Agents: A Scalable, Governed Pipeline with Selective Re-evaluation and Model Benchmarking
arXiv · 13 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 July 2026), “Agentic Skill Optimization over Lie Algebroids,” evidence record 3056, https://ethics.ai/record/3056 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.