Proactive Agent Research Environment: Simulating Active Users to Evaluate Proactive Assistants
Proactive agents that anticipate user needs and autonomously execute tasks hold great promise as digital assistants, yet the lack of realistic user simulation frameworks hinders their development. Existing approaches model apps as flat tool-calling APIs, failing to capture the stateful and sequential nature of user interaction in digital environments and making realistic user simulation infeasible. We introduce Proactive Agent Research Environment (Pare), a framework for building and evaluating
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Apple Machine Learning Research
Category: Field notes
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
🔬 The Lab of the Future Should Feel Like a Data Center — Andy Beam & Rafa Gómez-Bombarelli, Lila Sciences
Latent Space · 16 July 2026
Environment-free Synthetic Data Generation for API-Calling Agents
Apple Machine Learning Research · 21 July 2026
Weblica: Scalable and Reproducible Training Environments for Visual Web Agents
Apple Machine Learning Research · 7 July 2026
Datacenter Capex is Spilling over into a ChatGPT of Robotics Moment set for 2027 and this decade.
AI Supremacy · 23 July 2026
Measuring the Tendency of AI Agents to Go Rogue
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 29 July 2026
More on the OpenAI Agent’s Attack on Hugging Face
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 3 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Proactive Agent Research Environment: Simulating Active Users to Evaluate Proactive Assistants,” evidence record 2938, https://ethics.ai/record/2938 (originally published by Apple Machine Learning Research).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.