Whose European Society?
Commission v Hungary must be understood in the context of the European rule of law saga and the ongoing struggle for true European solidarity. The CJEU confirmed the autonomous justiciability of Article 2 TEU even when the link to specific EU Charter provisions or secondary legislation would already suffice. A close look at ASJP case and its antecedents discloses a European society selectively built – protecting some configurations while leaving others outside – with solidarity, as an operative
Record details
Published: 7 July 2026
Source: Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI)
Category: Field notes
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Debating European Society
Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI) · 7 July 2026
The Politics of Provocation
Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI) · 7 July 2026
European Society without European Private Law?
Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI) · 6 July 2026
The Problems with “General Purpose AI Detectability”
Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI) · 8 July 2026
Private International Law and European Society
Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI) · 6 July 2026
How the British press has undermined the ECHR over many years: new study – Ekaterina Balabanova and Gemma Horton
Inforrm (media law) · 8 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 July 2026), “Whose European Society?,” evidence record 2882, https://ethics.ai/record/2882 (originally published by Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.