The New York Times is escalating its fight with OpenAI, urging a judge to impose sanctions
The New York Times , the Daily News and other media outlets are asking a federal judge to impose sanctions on OpenAI , escalating a fight over artificial intelligence and copyright that could shape the future of a struggling news industry . The newspapers allege the ChatGPT maker is hiding evidence important to what could be a landmark copyright infringement trial over how OpenAI and its business partner, Microsoft , built their AI technologies using millions of news articles. At issue is whethe
Record details
Published: 10 July 2026
Source: Fast Company Tech
Category: News
Topics: Copyright & IP
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Can the New York Times Save Journalism From Our AI Overlords?
Wired · 28 July 2026
The New York Times is escalating its fight with OpenAI, urging a judge to impose sanctions
Fast Company · 10 July 2026
The New York Times is escalating its fight with OpenAI, urging a judge to impose sanctions
Fast Company · 10 July 2026
The New York Times is escalating its fight with OpenAI, urging a judge to impose sanctions
Fast Company · 10 July 2026
The New York Times is escalating its fight with OpenAI, urging a judge to impose sanctions
Fast Company · 10 July 2026
Nadella calls out AI labs like OpenAI and Anthropic for banning distillation while training on everyone else's data
The Decoder · 13 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 July 2026), “The New York Times is escalating its fight with OpenAI, urging a judge to impose sanctions,” evidence record 2572, https://ethics.ai/record/2572 (originally published by Fast Company Tech).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.