Corrigendum to ‘Making sense of wickedness: Directionality heuristics for challenge-led innovation policy’ [Research Policy 55 (2026) Article 105513]
Publication date: Available online 2 June 2026 Source: Research Policy Author(s): Matthias Mueller, Michael P. Schlaile, Stephanie Lang, Matthijs J. Janssen, Iris Wanzenböck, Kristina Bogner, Jana Zscheischler, Michael Schramm, Andreas Pyka
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Research Policy
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
From pitch to progress: The interplay of team reputation and governance in crowdfunded innovation
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
Editorial Board
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
The coevolution of financial and technological innovations
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
Social networks and technology adoption: Evidence from online banking
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
Digital innovation as a bank risk mitigator: Empirical insights from Chinese commercial banks
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
The rise of platforms in regulated industries: Ownership, curation, and the asymmetric strategies of challenger versus incumbent banks
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Corrigendum to ‘Making sense of wickedness: Directionality heuristics for challenge-led innovation policy’ [Research Policy 55 (2026) Article 105513],” evidence record 2389, https://ethics.ai/record/2389 (originally published by Research Policy).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.