Affordance actualisation in a disruptive environment: The role of blockchain technology
Publication date: October 2026 Source: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 231 Author(s): Jiaqi Yang, Alireza Amrollahi, Robbie Moulding, Josh Morton, John Palfreyman
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Category: Research
Topics: Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Greening but concentrating? The unintended effects of China's voluntary participatory environmental regulations on firms' innovation portfolios
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
From expertise to action: STEM-related human capital in top management teams and corporate climate adaptation and resilience
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
Evaluating and predicting the carbon footprint of training and inference for large-scale AI models in China
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Study of the co-evolution of heterogeneous policy combinations with AI-driven carbon emission monitoring and dynamic carbon trading mechanisms
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Erratum to “AI-driven carbon monitoring and policy mix co-evolution: Evidence from carbon trading dynamics” [Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 230 (2026) 124736]
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Smart cities, unequal outcomes: Artificial intelligence, environmental regulation, and urban carbon distribution in China
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Affordance actualisation in a disruptive environment: The role of blockchain technology,” evidence record 2218, https://ethics.ai/record/2218 (originally published by Technological Forecasting and Social Change).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.