Perceived and actual AI literacy in military organizations: a self-efficacy framework for training design
This study examines the underlying causes of the gap between perceived artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and the actual competencies of defense personnel, and explores structured training initiatives that can support reliable and responsible decision-making in AI-mediated operational environments. Grounded in self-efficacy theory and the cognitive psychology of competence assessment, the study advances the theoretically motivated proposition that the routine use of intelligent systems may co
Record details
Published: 6 July 2026
Source: AI & Society
Category: Research
Topics: Military & security · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SolarChain-Eval: A Physics-Constrained Benchmark for Trustworthy Economic Agents in Decentralized Energy Markets
arXiv · 9 July 2026
Generative AI and Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 1 July 2026
Internet of Agentic Things: Networked AI Agents for Closed-Loop IoT Orchestration
arXiv · 14 July 2026
SMC-ES: Automated synthesis of formally verified control policies
arXiv cs.AI · 16 July 2026
Federated Lightweight Intrusion Detection in Drone Swarms with Knowledge Distillation
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 19 July 2026
AI Sandboxes: A Threat Model, Taxonomy, and Measurement Framework
arXiv · 16 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 July 2026), “Perceived and actual AI literacy in military organizations: a self-efficacy framework for training design,” evidence record 1998, https://ethics.ai/record/1998 (originally published by AI & Society).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.