Supervised machine learning classifiers for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder using speech and language: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and novel quality assessment framework
This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 studies that developed speech- and language-based AI for severe mental illnesses (SMI) (i.e., characterized by substantial communication problems affecting speech production and language). We employed a random-effects meta-analysis using Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML). We evaluated these studies using our proposed rigorous 16-item quality assessment framework, grouped into three domains: Study Design, Fairness and Explainabili
Record details
Published: 29 June 2026
Source: Artificial Intelligence Review
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Sequential Fairness Auditing with Limited Output Access
arXiv · 29 June 2026
Adaptive Utility driven Resource Orchestration for Resilient AI (AURORA-AI)
arXiv · 25 June 2026
TIER: Trajectory-Invariant Explanation Regularization for Membership Privacy
arXiv · 3 July 2026
Who Gets Missed in the Tail? Thresholded Subgroup Underdiagnosis in Long-Tailed Chest X-ray Classification
arXiv fairness query · 4 July 2026
The Unseen Hand: Manipulating Model Fairness and SHAP with Targeted Identity Re-Association Attacks
arXiv · 22 June 2026
Fact-checking at a crossroads: Fact checkers’ perspectives on Community Notes, AI integration, and design recommendations
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 June 2026), “Supervised machine learning classifiers for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder using speech and language: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and novel quality assessment framework,” evidence record 1993, https://ethics.ai/record/1993 (originally published by Artificial Intelligence Review).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.