Princeton student says she did not conduct the experiments described in her now-retracted paper

Earlier this week, Retraction Watch reported on a Princeton student’s decision to retract her own paper from an engineering journal due to “significant methodological errors.” The student, Rishika Porandla, now tells us she never conducted the experiments described in the study. “The beam experiment described in the paper was a proposed experimental workflow with associated … Continue reading Princeton student says she did not conduct the experiments described in her now-retracted paper

Related evidence

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (14 August 2026), “Princeton student says she did not conduct the experiments described in her now-retracted paper,” evidence record 19603, https://ethics.ai/record/19603 (originally published by Retraction Watch).

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.