MARC v1: An Open-Source Multi-Agent Framework for Clinical AI Reasoning and Coordination
We present Multi-Agent Reasoning and Coordination (MARC), an open-source framework that replaces monolithic LLM prompting with deterministic multi-agent orchestration for clinical reasoning. MARC coordinates role-specialized agents for extraction, reasoning, answer generation, and evaluation, with explicit context passing and traceable intermediate outputs, enabling stage-wise failure attribution. We additionally introduce a Decomposer module that generates task-specific agent prompts from a pla
Record details
Published: 13 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Capability Sheaves for Compositional Agent-Harness Repair: Controlled Quotients and a Real-Repository Stress Test
arXiv · 13 August 2026
Why Do AI Agents Break Rules? How Framing, Context, and Social Signals Shape Compliance
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
Unmasking Toxic Mimicry in Medical Offline Reinforcement Learning for ICU Sepsis Management via Counterfactual Clinical Audits
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
CTBench: Evaluating Troubleshooting Capabilities of AI Agents in Realistic Telecom Network Operations
arXiv cs.AI · 12 August 2026
MIRA: Medical Image Reflection for Agentic Diagnosis
arXiv cs.AI · 11 August 2026
Avalon-ToM-Bench: Evaluating Fine-Grained Theory of Mind via Asymmetric Game Mechanics
arXiv cs.AI · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 August 2026), “MARC v1: An Open-Source Multi-Agent Framework for Clinical AI Reasoning and Coordination,” evidence record 19436, https://ethics.ai/record/19436 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.