We Need Global A.I. Safety Planning
We used to talk about the risks of A.I. a lot more. On a recent episode of “The Opinions,” the Opinion writer David Wallace-Wells speaks with the Yale law professor and economist Natasha Sarin about how A.I. safety could bring China and the U.S. together.
Record details
Published: 13 August 2026
Source: The New York Times
Category: News
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
As AI safety concerns mount, three pioneers make the case for staying open
TechCrunch · 12 August 2026
Your AI agent remembers everything. Here’s what happens when its owner changes.
The New Stack AI · 11 August 2026
Meta to challenge China’s open-weight AI dominance amid US regulatory fears
SCMP Tech (HK/CN) · 11 August 2026
Chinese users of AI companions bereft after government tightens regulations
Associated Press Technology · 10 August 2026
Beijing is forcing a mass breakup with AI lovers
Rest of World AI · 10 August 2026
AI at scale must be built on both trust and innovation
SCMP Tech (HK/CN) · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 August 2026), “We Need Global A.I. Safety Planning,” evidence record 19201, https://ethics.ai/record/19201 (originally published by The New York Times).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.