InSight-doc: Agentic Visual Perception for Long-Document Understanding
Long-document understanding often requires reasoning over many visually rich pages, making inference costly and prone to context rot. In this work, we propose InSight-doc, an agentic visual perception framework that treats visual resolution as an adaptive reasoning-time resource. InSight-doc starts from low resolution and selectively zooms into high-resolution regions for finer evidence, without relying on any external retriever. To train such an agent, we construct an active-perception corpus o
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: HuggingFace Daily Papers
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SKILLER: Language-Level Reinforcement Learning for Reusable Skill Extraction in Small Language Models
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
Self-Evolving Embodied Agents via Skill-Harness Evolution
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
VibeLifeBench: Can Your Life Agent Be Proactive and Persistent in a Living World?
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
DSAgentBench: Can Agents Automate End-to-End Data-Science Workflows in Real Computer Environments?
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
SkillZip: Evaluation-Free Skill Compression for Self-Evolving Agents by Discovering Reusable Structure
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “InSight-doc: Agentic Visual Perception for Long-Document Understanding,” evidence record 18754, https://ethics.ai/record/18754 (originally published by HuggingFace Daily Papers).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.