Generating Attacks for LLMs with GFlowNets
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has facilitated their ubiquitous integration into various domains, leading to widespread adoption. However, this escalating trend has introduced significant security vulnerabilities, necessitating the identification and mitigation of flaws arising from malicious exploitation. Red teaming assessments, conducted to evaluate model robustness through diverse adversarial inputs, are essential for exposing security risks and implementing countermea
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv red teaming query
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AdvFD: Boosting Visual Generation via Adversarial Fr'echet Distance Loss
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
DistilVDR: A Compact End-to-End Visual Document Retriever via Dual-Student Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
Evaluation-Conditioned Training: Teaching Models to Generalize to Stronger Oversight Regimes
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Procedural Fairness Failures in RLHF from Preference Averaging
arXiv fairness query · 10 August 2026
Agentic Harnesses: LLM-Driven Verification Layers for Robot Autonomy
arXiv · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Generating Attacks for LLMs with GFlowNets,” evidence record 18690, https://ethics.ai/record/18690 (originally published by arXiv red teaming query).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.