Evidence record 18441 · automatically gathered

Context and Symmetry in Auditing: A Case Study of Skeleton Inference in Motion Capture

Humans are increasingly expected to interact with AI systems that observe and make inferences about them - but do these systems actually work? A standard approach to answering this question is AI auditing. Conducting an AI audit requires identifying how a system behaves (i.e., determining what types of inputs to audit it with and then observing and documenting actual system behavior) and contrasting that with how a system should behave (i.e., determining what the nominal outputs of a system shou

Record details

Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 12 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Context and Symmetry in Auditing: A Case Study of Skeleton Inference in Motion Capture,” evidence record 18441, https://ethics.ai/record/18441 (originally published by arXiv).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.