Context and Symmetry in Auditing: A Case Study of Skeleton Inference in Motion Capture
Humans are increasingly expected to interact with AI systems that observe and make inferences about them - but do these systems actually work? A standard approach to answering this question is AI auditing. Conducting an AI audit requires identifying how a system behaves (i.e., determining what types of inputs to audit it with and then observing and documenting actual system behavior) and contrasting that with how a system should behave (i.e., determining what the nominal outputs of a system shou
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Context and Symmetry in Auditing: A Case Study of Skeleton Inference in Motion Capture
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Multimodal Model Diffing for Feature Discovery and Control
arXiv cs.AI · 10 August 2026
Comprendia: AI-Augmented Code Comprehension
arXiv cs.HC · 10 August 2026
Neuroevolution Arena: Nested Ecological Evaluation of Update-and-Inheritance Regimes across Neural Architectures
arXiv · 10 August 2026
KGCaRe: Explainable Complex Conditional Question Answering using Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction and Context Retrieval with LLMs
arXiv cs.AI · 10 August 2026
Visual-to-Haptic Augmentation in XR: A Wearable Glove for Perceptual Grounding in Multimodal Interaction
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Context and Symmetry in Auditing: A Case Study of Skeleton Inference in Motion Capture,” evidence record 18441, https://ethics.ai/record/18441 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.