Distilling Vision-Language Models for Robust Traffic Sign Perception in Autonomous Vehicles
Traffic sign recognition (TSR) models based on deep neural networks achieve strong clean-data performance but remain vulnerable to physically realizable adversarial attacks, including shadow perturbations, natural-light interference, and printed patches. Existing defenses often improve robustness against one attack type while degrading performance on others, and can reduce clean accuracy. We propose LAMDA (Language-Anchored Model for Direction Alignment), a training framework that transfers lang
Record details
Published: 9 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.LG
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Learning from Consensus and Disagreement: Unsupervised On-Policy Self-Distillation with Minority-Trajectory Contrast
arXiv cs.LG · 9 August 2026
From Inaudible Inputs to Model Failures: Low-Frequency Safety Risks in LALMs
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 9 August 2026
Charting Public Health: A Taxonomic Study of Visualization Practices in the Public Health Field
arXiv cs.HC · 9 August 2026
Faithful or evasive? An empirical study on translation norm preferences of Chinese and American LLMs in Chinese official political and policy discourse
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 10 August 2026
GA-AFedOD: gradient-aligned active federated learning for resource-aware object detection in edge industrial IoT
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 10 August 2026
Label-Free Parkinson's Disease Screening from Face and Voice through Mechanistic Interpretability
arXiv cs.LG · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 August 2026), “Distilling Vision-Language Models for Robust Traffic Sign Perception in Autonomous Vehicles,” evidence record 18326, https://ethics.ai/record/18326 (originally published by arXiv cs.LG).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.