Hallucinations and Constraints : Regulating surgical workflow recognition beyond accuracy
Hallucinations are a major concern for the integration of artificial intelligence into medicine, although less explored in the realm of medical image processing. Unlike problems in natural text understanding and reasoning therewith, determining whether or not predictions derived from biomedical images and signals is less intuitively clear. This article suggests that topological errors could constitute hallucinations in a way that can be more readily measured and thus regulated. Certain of these
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.LG
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Where Does AI Innovation Go? Measuring Research Attention Imbalance in AI Music
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
NIH limits funding for research on the health effects of public policy
Nature Machine Intelligence · 10 August 2026
Social Media as a Driver of Obesity in Children and Adolescents (Aged 6-18 Years): It Is Time for Regulatory Action
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 10 August 2026
SocialFiVis: A Visual Analytics Sandbox for LLM-Grounded Multi-Agent Simulation in Social Finance
arXiv cs.HC · 9 August 2026
Trump wants MMR vaccine split up: the science behind why it’s a bad idea
Nature Machine Intelligence · 11 August 2026
When Offline Evaluation Misleads: A Diagnostic Protocol for Reward and Policy Selection in Delayed-Feedback Contextual Bandits
arXiv cs.LG · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Hallucinations and Constraints : Regulating surgical workflow recognition beyond accuracy,” evidence record 18321, https://ethics.ai/record/18321 (originally published by arXiv cs.LG).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.