Sci-VBench: Evaluating Knowledge- and Reasoning-Intensive Video Generation in Science Domains
We introduce Sci-VBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating knowledge- and reasoning-intensive video generation across scientific domains. It contains 1,253 expert-annotated examples spanning 60 subjects across four core disciplines: Natural Science, Healthcare, Humanities & Social Sciences, and Engineering. Each example requires models to generate temporally rich videos that demand scientific reasoning and knowledge-grounded synthesis, going beyond surface-level visual plausibility. We fu
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Sci-VBench: Evaluating Knowledge- and Reasoning-Intensive Video Generation in Science Domains
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 9 August 2026
Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Adverse Drug Events Characterized by Medication Replacement in Primary Care Electronic Medical Records: Algorithm and Validation Study
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 10 August 2026
Towards Expert-level Medical AI for Real-time Video Consultations
arXiv cs.AI · 10 August 2026
Designing for Autonomous Motivation: Qualitative Interview Study on Pre-Enrollment Preferences of Survivors of Cancer for Digital Health Behavior Change Programs
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 10 August 2026
NIH limits funding for research on the health effects of public policy
Nature Machine Intelligence · 10 August 2026
MedPixel: A Unified Pixel-Language Model for Medical Reasoning and Segmentation
arXiv cs.AI · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Sci-VBench: Evaluating Knowledge- and Reasoning-Intensive Video Generation in Science Domains,” evidence record 18249, https://ethics.ai/record/18249 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.