Reading Copom's Tone: A Weighted LLM Framework for Hawkish-Dovish Sentiment, Forward Guidance, and Uncertainty
This paper documents an applied natural-language-processing framework for measuring the tone of Brazilian Monetary Policy Committee (Copom) statements. The project is explicitly inspired by iSent, Itaú's Central Bank sentiment classifier, particularly its sentence-level division of official communication into hawkish, dovish, neutral, and out-of-context classes. The implementation extends that idea in three directions. First, an LLM identifies short hawkish and dovish expressions and assigns eac
Record details
Published: 7 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 10 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Open Veins of Algorithmic Auditing: Why AI Assessment Lags Behind Its Deployment in the Global South
arXiv · 23 July 2026
Margin Play: A Multi-Agent System For Public Policy Analysis In The Brazilian Equatorial Margin
arXiv · 26 May 2026
HR-Agents: Using Multiple LLM-based Agents to Improve Q&A about Brazilian Labor Legislation
arXiv · 13 March 2026
Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review
OpenAlex · 17 April 2022
The DOJ Has Betrayed Epstein Survivors — New Mexico Is Suing Over The Latest Issue
Above the Law (legal tech) · 6 August 2026
Brazil's Electoral Court Wants Platform Compliance Plans. Can It Enforce Them?
Tech Policy Press · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “Reading Copom's Tone: A Weighted LLM Framework for Hawkish-Dovish Sentiment, Forward Guidance, and Uncertainty,” evidence record 17929, https://ethics.ai/record/17929 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.