AI alignment is a red herring
The best way to prevent a rogue AGI from processing the Earth into maximum paperclips is to unleash a second AGI that will work to stop it. The problem of ensuring that an AGI doesn’t mulch everything into paperclips by mistake is called alignment. AGI = artificial general intelligence, an AI that exceeds human capability. Alignment = “do what I mean not what I say,” e.g. the instruction “ make as many paperclips as possible ” (Wikipedia) should result in an efficient factory and does not reason
Record details
Published: 8 August 2026
Source: Interconnected (Matt Webb)
Category: Field notes
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 9 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
8 Predictions for the Era of Continual Learning
Dwarkesh Podcast (posts) · 7 August 2026
US Senate Commerce approves KOSA, children's AI safety bills
IAPP · 6 August 2026
Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models
Simon Willisons Weblog · 5 August 2026
Geoffrey Irving on how to solve alignment before superintelligence arrives
80,000 Hours · 11 August 2026
Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs
Simon Willisons Weblog · 11 August 2026
Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study
Apple Machine Learning Research · 3 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (8 August 2026), “AI alignment is a red herring,” evidence record 17712, https://ethics.ai/record/17712 (originally published by Interconnected (Matt Webb)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.