Competing AI ecosystems and the openness–security dilemma: A national innovation systems analysis of China's AI policy
Publication date: October 2026 Source: Telecommunications Policy, Volume 50, Issue 9 Author(s): Yi Yang, Xin Ji
Record details
Published: 9 August 2026
Source: Telecommunications Policy
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 9 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Faithful or evasive? An empirical study on translation norm preferences of Chinese and American LLMs in Chinese official political and policy discourse
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 10 August 2026
Social Media as a Driver of Obesity in Children and Adolescents (Aged 6-18 Years): It Is Time for Regulatory Action
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 10 August 2026
Copyright governance for GenAI-assisted works: Insights from Chinese judicial practice
Telecommunications Policy · 7 August 2026
Toward a nuanced understanding of internet use and trust in local government in the Chinese context
Telecommunications Policy · 5 August 2026
Digital platforms and regulatory coordination patterns in China: Network evidence from Nanjing's “181” integrated emergency management system
Government Information Quarterly · 13 August 2026
China Has Moved to Regulate Expertise Online—and the West Should Pay Attention
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 31 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 August 2026), “Competing AI ecosystems and the openness–security dilemma: A national innovation systems analysis of China's AI policy,” evidence record 17699, https://ethics.ai/record/17699 (originally published by Telecommunications Policy).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.