Evidence record 17506 · automatically gathered

A Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models in Radiology (RadM-Bench): Evaluation Development and Validation

Background: Multimodal large language models are increasingly used in radiological diagnosis, but their performance has not been systematically evaluated across volumetric (3D) imaging, real-world clinical versus public teaching cases, and bilingual contexts. Objective: The aim of the study is to develop a bilingual radiology benchmark and characterize the diagnostic performance of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models across input modality, clinical setting (public teaching vs routi

Record details

Published: 7 August 2026
Source: JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 8 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “A Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models in Radiology (RadM-Bench): Evaluation Development and Validation,” evidence record 17506, https://ethics.ai/record/17506 (originally published by JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.