Breaking Customized LLMs for Coding: Automated Red Teaming for Instruction Backdoor Attacks
LLM customization platforms allow users to build task-specific models for code intelligence tasks by embedding instructions into system prompts, without modifying the underlying model parameters. While these platforms lower the barrier to developing customized LLMs, they also introduce a new attack surface: instruction backdoor attacks, in which adversaries implant hidden malicious behaviors into customized instructions. However, existing attacks suffer from two key limitations. First, they ofte
Record details
Published: 6 August 2026
Source: arXiv red teaming query
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 7 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Studying People to Study AI: Expert Perspectives on the Epistemic Fit and Barriers of Human Research in AI Safety & Ethics
arXiv cs.HC · 6 August 2026
Studying People to Study AI: Expert Perspectives on the Epistemic Fit and Barriers of Human Research in AI Safety & Ethics
arXiv · 6 August 2026
DistMedVL: Distributional Vision-Language Alignment for Uncertainty-Aware Medical Image Segmentation
arXiv · 6 August 2026
CircuitSteer: Geometrically Aligned Multi-Layer Steering via Sparse Autoencoder Circuits
arXiv alignment query · 6 August 2026
Functional Misalignment in Human-AI Interactions on Digital Platforms
arXiv cs.CY · 6 August 2026
How Should AI Safety Benchmarks Benchmark Safety?
arXiv cs.CY · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 August 2026), “Breaking Customized LLMs for Coding: Automated Red Teaming for Instruction Backdoor Attacks,” evidence record 17387, https://ethics.ai/record/17387 (originally published by arXiv red teaming query).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.