Improving the Realism of Synthetic Clinical Benchmarks Under Utility Constraints
Synthetic clinical benchmarks for enterprise AI agents can pass existing utility checks and still remain structurally unrealistic, especially in privacy-sensitive healthcare settings where operational data are hard to access. We study how to improve such benchmarks without breaking the downstream utility checks already used in practice. We formulate benchmark revision as utility-constrained realism improvement: dataset changes should increase realism while staying above an operational utility fl
Record details
Published: 6 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Healthcare · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 7 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Guideline-as-Oracle: Zero-Annotation Training of an Ophthalmic Telephone Triage Agent
arXiv cs.AI · 5 August 2026
OPERA: Offline Policy-guided Expert Routing and Adaptation for Universal Biomedical Image Analysis
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 26 July 2026
HiMe: Real-Time Self-Hosted Personal Agent Platform for Health Insights with Wearable Devices
arXiv cs.HC · 23 July 2026
Code-Poisoning Property Inference Attacks
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 17 July 2026
Recent advances in AI-based mobile robots for human companionship: survey
Artificial Intelligence Review · 29 June 2026
Synthesis and Evaluation of Long-term History-aware Medical Dialogue
arXiv · 19 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 August 2026), “Improving the Realism of Synthetic Clinical Benchmarks Under Utility Constraints,” evidence record 17067, https://ethics.ai/record/17067 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.