Gender-Based Heterogeneity in Youth Privacy-Protective Behavior for Smart Voice Assistants: Evidence from Multigroup PLS-SEM
arXiv:2603.27117v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper investigates how gender shapes privacy decision-making in youth smart voice assistant (SVA) ecosystems. Using survey data from 469 Canadian youths aged 16-24, we apply multigroup Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to compare males (N=241) and females (N=174) (total N = 415) across five privacy constructs: Perceived Privacy Risks (PPR), Perceived Privacy Benefits (PPBf), Algorithmic Transparency and Trust (ATT),
Record details
Published: 7 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Transparency · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 7 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Explainable Graph Neural Networks for Interbank Contagion Surveillance: A Regulatory-Aligned Framework for the U.S. Banking Sector
arXiv · 14 April 2026
When AI Meets Early Childhood Education: Large Language Models as Assessment Teammates in Chinese Preschools
arXiv · 25 March 2026
Notes from the IAPP Canada: Is it time to rethink longstanding privacy principles?
IAPP · 16 July 2026
Investigating Artificial Intelligence Digital Sovereignty in Mobile Shopping Apps: A Case Study of Nigeria
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
Validity, Reliability, and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence Regulation
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
Soft Redaction of Image Provenance via Zero-Knowledge Proofs
arXiv · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “Gender-Based Heterogeneity in Youth Privacy-Protective Behavior for Smart Voice Assistants: Evidence from Multigroup PLS-SEM,” evidence record 17025, https://ethics.ai/record/17025 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.