Trident : How to Break Deep Reinforcement Learning Cyber Defenses (Agentic)
Autonomous cyber defense systems based on Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) have attracted significant research attention, yet remain evaluated almost exclusively against static, heuristic red agents, leaving their robustness against adaptive threats critically understudied. Meanwhile, recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have improved LLM reasoning, but their integration into cybersecurity remains elusive due to the absence of suitable benchmark environments
Record details
Published: 5 August 2026
Source: arXiv red teaming query
Category: Research
Topics: Military & security · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 6 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems
arXiv cs.AI · 31 July 2026
Distilling Knowledge from Large Language Models into Lightweight Reinforcement Learning Agents for Autonomous Cyber Operations
arXiv cs.LG · 30 July 2026
Internet of Agentic Things: Networked AI Agents for Closed-Loop IoT Orchestration
arXiv · 14 July 2026
SolarChain-Eval: A Physics-Constrained Benchmark for Trustworthy Economic Agents in Decentralized Energy Markets
arXiv · 9 July 2026
The Internet of Agentic AI: Communication, Coordination, and Collective Intelligence at Scale
arXiv · 11 June 2026
Insurance of Agentic AI
arXiv · 3 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “Trident : How to Break Deep Reinforcement Learning Cyber Defenses (Agentic),” evidence record 16969, https://ethics.ai/record/16969 (originally published by arXiv red teaming query).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.