CoPlan: A Trustworthy Co-Intelligence Interface for Care Planning through Role-Based Contestable Argument Graphs
AI-supported care planning can help clinicians, patients, caregivers, and care teams coordinate complex decisions across clinical, functional, psychosocial, and environmental needs. However, many AI systems present recommendations as fixed outputs, limiting stakeholders' ability to inspect, challenge, and revise plans when they conflict with clinical judgment, patient values, or real-world feasibility. We present CoPlan - a Co-Intelligent and Contestable Interface for Human-AI Care Planning. CoP
Record details
Published: 5 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Environment
Retrieved: 6 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Teaching Nemotron Greek: Mining a Corpus, Adapting Retrieval, and Grounding Generation for Modern Greek across Specialist Domains
arXiv cs.AI · 5 August 2026
Teaching Nemotron Greek: Mining a Corpus, Adapting Retrieval, and Grounding Generation for Modern Greek across Specialist Domains
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 4 August 2026
The Digital Evolution of the Medical Black Bag: Environmental Scan With Trend Analysis and Horizon Scanning
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 6 August 2026
Avatar-Mediated Telepsychotherapy in a Metaverse-Informed Virtual Environment: Qualitative Study of User Experiences and Design Requirements
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 6 August 2026
ResidencyRL: Reinforcement Learning in Simulated Clinical Environments
arXiv · 7 August 2026
When Confidence Fails: Overconfidence in LLMs under Uncertainty and Missing Clinical Information
arXiv cs.HC · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “CoPlan: A Trustworthy Co-Intelligence Interface for Care Planning through Role-Based Contestable Argument Graphs,” evidence record 16916, https://ethics.ai/record/16916 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.