FPF and Leading Companies Release Risk Assessment Framework and Updated Best Practices for AI in Hiring & Employment
Expert working group updates 2023 report to account for the rise of generative AI; will host a webinar on September 28 to present an overview of best practices and risk framework WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF), with Dayforce, LinkedIn, UKG, Workday, and Beamery – leading HR, payroll, and employment software developers […]
Record details
Published: 5 August 2026
Source: Future of Privacy Forum
Category: Field notes
Topics: Privacy · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 6 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
FPF Statement on the Senior Chatbot Protection Bill
Future of Privacy Forum · 5 August 2026
New Survey: Privacy Concerns Are A Top Barrier to AgeTech Adoption Among Older Adults
Future of Privacy Forum · 20 July 2026
New Survey: Privacy Concerns Are A Top Barrier to AgeTech Adoption Among Older Adults
Future of Privacy Forum · 20 July 2026
FPF Submits Comments to Inform California Children’s Social Media Protections Rulemaking Process
Future of Privacy Forum · 15 July 2026
Data Brokers & Beyond: Navigating New Jersey’s Data Broker & “Data Collector” Registration Law
Future of Privacy Forum · 10 July 2026
FPF Hosts Frontiers Workshop on Privacy, AI, and Emerging Infrastructure
Future of Privacy Forum · 9 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “FPF and Leading Companies Release Risk Assessment Framework and Updated Best Practices for AI in Hiring & Employment,” evidence record 16682, https://ethics.ai/record/16682 (originally published by Future of Privacy Forum).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.