Evidence record 16610 · automatically gathered

Search, Inspect, Fetch: Exploiting Boolean Retrieval for Deep-Research Agents

Existing deep-research agents use a search-visit workflow that retrieves and reads whole pages, without considering the addressable structure that web sources expose through titles, headings, sections, and metadata. This prevents agents from directly constraining retrieval to document fields and often carries irrelevant page content into their context. We introduce SIEVE, a search-inspect-fetch interface driven by fielded Boolean retrieval (BQL). SIEVE filters candidates over document fields, ra

Record details

Published: 2 August 2026
Source: HuggingFace Daily Papers
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 6 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (2 August 2026), “Search, Inspect, Fetch: Exploiting Boolean Retrieval for Deep-Research Agents,” evidence record 16610, https://ethics.ai/record/16610 (originally published by HuggingFace Daily Papers).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.